A Kindie Manifesto

I am not a person to whom the word "manifesto" comes easily.   Given my own personality -- a predilection for strong opinions loosely held and the ability if not compulsion to see multiple sides of an issue -- I tend not to shout my opinions from the rooftops or present them as the  opinion.

Having said that, I've written probably two million words on the subject of kids music on this site (not an exaggeration).  It is safe to say I have an opinion or two on the matter.

***** 

The wonderful Liz Gumbinner, co-proprietor of literally the biggest platform for kindie music on the internet, Cool Mom Picks (her audience >>> my audience), drew attention to this video on the subject of toddler music from Wired  on her personal blog, Mom-101 a couple days. As Liz notes, the video hits mostly all the right notes regarding parenting and music, but strikes such cluelessness regarding what music's being made for toddlers these days that it's hard to believe it's the same magazine whose website once published kids music reviews from GeekDad and GeekMom, and, yes, even published a review from me in the actual magazine.  (Not to mention picking targets -- if they'd published the same piece but substituted, say Yo Gabba Gabba!  for the Wiggles and Barney, people would wonder about the piece's logic.  And more kids watch YGG  today than the other two shows.)

This ignorance (feigned or real) of a large swath of music made for families has inspired me to consolidate my views on what kindie music is into a coherent list (because stuff on the internet should always be in list format).  I've been spreading the word about the incredible amount of quality music available for families for years now, but clearly some people have missed or are ignoring the message.  Maybe I need to dumb it down a bit.

***** 

What follows is a distillation of a decade and two million words into ten points regarding what good kindie music is and how it should be integrated into families.  (Why ten?  It's a round number, time-honored for lists, and a lot easier than ninety-five.)

Some caveats (because I'm all about the caveats):

  • Most of these points aren't absolute -- I could grade music I hear on a spectrum for a lot of these, but I've found that a lot of good kids music meets or fails a lot of these criteria as a group.

  • This should not be read as saying this stuff has only occurred in the past decade or so.  There are of course artists who've been living by these rules for twenty or thirty years, and I'm glad that they helped pave the way (and are still an important part of the kindie community), but the technological and societal changes of the past fifteen to twenty years have made following this philosophy easier if not essential.

  • It's only a  manifesto, not the  manifesto, but it's born of more than a decade of listening to, considering, and writing about music made for kids and families.  If you're at least a semi-regular reader, I'm guessing that your own manifesto will have more points in common than not.

Here goes:

1.  Kids deserve their own music: In just about every other cultural arts endeavor -- literature, theatre, television, playthings, apps -- the concept that there are separate creations specifically for kids is expected and celebrated.  Nobody's saying, "I read Gabriel Garcia Marquez and watch Mad Men  with my kids and it's good enough for them."  Nobody becomes a parent and is surprised to find that people write and draw books for kids.  But that's still a common attitude when it comes to music.  Why is it so hard for people to accept that kids might want music that speaks to them?

2. Kids music should reflect the full range of kids' experiences in language they understand: In an interview with me a few years ago, Peter Himmelman -- who knows a thing or two about making music for kids and adults -- said that the "child is as intelligent as his adult self, but some things are beyond his experience."  Not a small amount of music made for adults is written about experiences beyond that of a child (e.g., romantic love).  The emotion of loss and elation is universal, but how kids experience those emotions is different from how adults do.  Ironically, although kids' range of experiences may be limited, the range of experiences in kids music is much broader than music generally.

3. Music for kids should be made with every bit as much care as music made for the rest of the population: Do illustrators for kids books limit themselves to the crappier brushes from the art store?  Do producers TV cartoons for kids recruit anyone from off the street to voice the characters?  Do bloggers hate strawman arguments?  Of course not.  If you're an artist willing to use cheap electronic keyboards and drum tracks in making music for kids, then you better be willing to use those same keyboards and drum tracks if you make music for adults.  You don't need a dozen band members if that's not your style -- folks like Ella Jenkins or Randy Kaplan can captivate an audience with nothing but a harmonica or a guitar -- but you do need to treat your audience, whatever its age, with respect.  And don't get me started on album art, suffice it to say that after receiving way more than a thousand kids' CDs, probably two thousand, the quality of album art and packaging is close to being a statistically significant indicator of the music inside.

4. Stories not messages: I think kindie music is at its best when it tells stories -- character studies, funny jokes -- or shares experiences (dancing, singing along).  It should start with that as the premise.  It is difficult for music to be engaging when it starts off with an idea that it should be about  something.  Artists like Justin Roberts, Dan Zanes, Elizabeth Mitchell, Laurie Berkner, They Might Be Giants -- artists, I would add, who are tremendously successful not only artistically but also commercially -- have never appeared to say, "I want to record an album about [important subject X].  I know, I know -- I could list a number of albums who violate this point, but those are the exceptions who point to the rule.  Note I said "messages," not "lessons," because there's a lesson to be learned from almost any song, but it's often just a byproduct and not the reason for existence.  Albums that teach a subject (be it a school subject or a life skill) well are valuable, but they're valuable for their educational purposes and the value musically is often mixed at best.

5. Musicians not characters: This is a bit simplified, because there a number of kindie "characters" who are totally kindie.  Gustafer Yellowgold, for example, and his whole world of animated friends, or the videos of Readeez.  What I'm getting at is that in a world where self-expression is prized, anonymity of creation is a big ol' warning sign.  Morgan Taylor and Michael Rachap are very visible creators of Gustafer and Readeez.  I would rather hear an individual and unique creation than a pre-fabricated set of interchangeable anonymized parts in a musical widget.

6. Kindie music as community: Musicians have always banded together, of course, even kids musicians.  But the level of interaction is at a much higher level now.  That interaction can occur on record, of course, and it does for many musicians, but even many of the musicians who are less "sharing" on record are often sharing of their time and support in other areas and at events like Kindiefest.  That idea that we're bound for better weather together, that one's success does not mean another's failure, is key.  As a result, there is no excuse -- NONE -- for uttering, writing, or even thinking the phrase, "Finally, kids music the whole family can enjoy."  It wasn't true thirty years ago (though such albums were fewer in number and harder to access) and certainly isn't true today (would I really spend 10+ years and two million words on crappy music?).  As time goes on, if you are a musician (or writer) and continue to peddle that line, I am increasingly willing to believe you are ignorant or deliberately misleading.  It is also more common than you might think that music advertised as "finally, kids music the whole family can enjoy" will, in fact, be music that nobody will enjoy.  And, more to the point of kindie music as community, it also diminishes the genre you're trying to succeed in.  Stop it.  Now.  Seriously.

6. Sing and dance along: This is not a new concept -- music was originally a participative art and it's only been in the last century or so that performing and passive listening has become a common if not default mode of interacting with music.  But kindie families should not fall into the trap of popping the CD into the CD player (or scrolling to the correct mp3 on their smartphones) and pressing "play."  Dance along.  Sing along -- sing even if there's no music playing.  Your kids will -- you should, too, and the best kids music will make it easy to do.

7. Music is better heard live: And what better place to sing and dance along than by seeing music performed live?  I mean, sure, maybe you sing better in the shower or your kids wail along in the bathtub, but I highly advise against dancing in either locale.  It can sometimes be difficult to hear kids music live with your kids -- you live in a town or city with few if any kids musicians, and the difficulty of stringing together tours for kindie musicians (since gigs can often only be managed on weekends) makes it even more difficult.  But it's worth the effort.

8. Enjoy this with your kids: You should be able to share these experiences with your kids.  We see theatre with them, take them to movies, watch TV, play sports, walk out in nature -- so, yes, there's room to listen to music with your kids.  There is a sizable body of work in kids music that I can say without any qualification is enjoyable to parents just as much as kids.  Sometimes that's because it's incredibly danceable, sometimes it's because it's a perfect pop song or an absurdly funny aside, and sometimes it's because the songwriter has tapped into an emotion that's universal and written it in a way that's accessible to listeners of many different ages and experiences.  

9. It's OK if kids listen to stuff you hate: Or, alternately, it's OK to hate your kids' music.  One cannot make their kids cool by forcing them to listen to a certain band, adult or not.  Cool comes from self-confidence, and self-confidence comes from exploring all your options and knowing that the music you're listening to (or, not to put too fine a point on it, making) most reflects your personal tastes.  I think one job of a parent is to give their kids a wide range of experiences, not so they can become cool, but because they'll understand the world a tiny bit better.  The kindie parent probably doesn't have to give their kids a "Barney" experience, they'll probably get that on their own without you having to help.  Hence, your desire to bring a little Lunch Money or Secret Agent 23 Skidoo or [insert-your-own-favorite artist] into the mix.  But, you know, if they want to listen to or watch Barney, that's OK.   Because music is a personal thing, and kids should be able to own their tastes.  And as a side note, remember that you shouldn't follow this rule slavishly - it's OK to listen to your own stuff, too (with your own parental standards, whatever they may be, applying).

10. It's OK to like what you like, just give kids their own opportunity :  OK, I'll fess up -- I had a variety of points I wanted to mention and as I consolidated and refined them, I came to #10 without anything left to write.  So this is me, emphasizing that music helps us, regardless of age, relate to the world.  Whatever music you like, listen to or perform that -- your kid seeing you enjoy music will drive home the idea that music is a good thing.  Kids will eventually find their music without your help, but with the best of today's kindie music you can provide them with many more maps to choose from.

Kindiefest 2013: Finding Your Mississippi River

IMG_1119.jpg

Another Kindiefest has come and gone and all that is left are the bar tabs, sore legs, and hoarse voices.

The seventh annual confab of kindie musicians (fifth as a full-fledged conference) broke its own attendance record this year and moved into new digs, the Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) Fisher building.  But the basic concept -- meet, learn, and sing -- remains unchanged.

Every year, I am a little less interested in the panels and a little more interested in the people.  To a large extent, the reason for that is that I don't need to listen to a panel how to make a kindie music record.  It's great for the first-time attendees (of which there are always a lot), but as a veteran non-professional musician, it's not helpful.

What is helpful is talking to people.  I have always found the conversations outside the walls of the conference itself to be most valuable, because those conversations (sometimes aided by bar tabs, though not necessarily) tend to be more real, more likely to generate real sharing, real connections.  Instead of trying to sell a concept or an album, you're trying to understand the other person, and maybe, in that process share who or what you are as a musician (or writer or booker).  Even if you're not sure whether you like someone's music, or writing, or whatever, you can still make a genuine connection.

For my part at the conference, I was asked to present a curated list of kids music videos along with a brief presentation on the history and types of videos.  Frankly, it was just fun seeing all those videos shown on a big screen and through a nice soundsystem.

IMG_1101.jpg

One thing I only realized as I sat through the entire 40-minute, 13-song DVD I'd compiled was how much the artist's personality comes through in each of those videos.  That was not something I'd consciously done when I picked the videos, but I think it's clear that the artists that have found their band's or personality's heart in their video and it's that clarity that shines through.

The surprise of my video presentation was that I got to world premiere the first-ever video from Lunch Money.  It's for their song "Spicy Kid," and I found Molly's description of it as "half Mentos ad, half Blues Brothers excerpt" as being particularly apropos.  What's more, because it's funny at points, tender at others, it very much feels like Lunch Money, like Molly and the band had found another way to express themselves.

****

Despite my comments above, I did sit through about half of the panels, and while there were lots of useful pieces of information and funny moments, only once did somebody say something that made me dig out my phone and jot down what they said.

It was Molly (natch), who on the panel on "What's Next?" talked about getting the Can You Canoe? disk from the Okee Dokee Brothers for the first time, popping it in the CD player, and listening.  She may have used a curse word in describing her initial reaction, I can't remember properly because that happened several times during the weekend (Kindiefest: Where Kindie Musicians Go To Curse).  But, long story short: she loved the album and felt the Okee Dokee Brothers had found something deep within themselves in singing about their trek down the Mississippi River.  She encouraged the attendees to "find their own Mississippi River," and if that wasn't a metaphor for what folks said all weekend, I'm not sure what is.  Kindie musicians -- and, heck, people generally -- need to let their personalities and artistic goals shine through, and I hope there was enough proof during the weekend of just how valuable that approach can be, certainly artistically, but also even career-wise.  Know your song, and sing it loud.

****

Other notes from the weekend:

-- The industry showcase concert Saturday night was, as always, a combination of more experienced artists who might not have had the broader exposure of the industry stage and more relative newcomers.  The set that most impressed me was definitely Mister G's. He came up on stage with nothing more than a guitar, a kick drum, and his wife, and within 3 minutes (probably more like 2) had the entire crowd close to the stage, clapping and singing along.  By the end of his set, he'd filled the stage with other kindie musicians, and thoroughly entertained us all.

IMG_1162.jpg

-- Everybody was entertaining in one way or another Saturday night -- live shows almost always add to an artist's reputation -- so I'm hesitant to recommend any more, but a brief shoutout to Vered and the Babes (her backing band of 4 guys), who translated her simple songs focused on bonding with baby into something that worked surprisingly well in a much less-intimate setting.  Also, in the category of "sometimes being unknown is an advantage," newcomers Bears and Lions performed a set featuring songs like "I'm a Mediocre Kid" (much more upbeat and celebratory that the title would imply), people dressed up as bears and lions in track suits, and absurd songs and patter remiscent of other surreal duos like the Telephone Company, The Quiet Two, The Thinkers, and fellow showcase performers Ratboy Jr (pictured here with Dean Jones helping the boys out).

IMG_1166.jpg

-- I have said that my favorite part of Kindiefest is the connecting with others, and my favorite way of connecting at the festival is probably at the showcase.  It's the singing in 8-part harmony, it's the dancing, and, in the case of the concluding performance from Dan Zanes and Elizabeth Mitchell, even a tunnel for audience to dance under.  It's a communal feeling that underlies the entire conference.  And it's a ton of fun.

-- Other things I liked: The empanadas at the food truck down the street.  Edvard Munch's "The Scream" at MOMA.  Underbirds at Symphony Space and Raffi at Town Hall (more on those separately).  Running around Prospect Park on a beautiful Saturday morning.  Getting to sing with Ella Jenkins.  Talking with fellow kindie folks (too many to name, but I will give a tip of the cap to Jeff Bogle and Dave Loftin).

-- Things I'm sorry I missed: The KindieTalks (especially Laurie Berkner's).  The barbecue place around the corner from BAM.  Sleep.  Walking across the Brooklyn Bridge with Lloyd Miller.  The Sunday public festival.  Stretching.  Bill Childs.

Back in the real world, I'm trying to remember the lessons of Kindiefest, but I think if I just keep searching for my own Mississippi River, I'll be OK.

Why Listen to Kids Music (An Open Letter to Tom Moon)

Zooglobble: What are your musical memories growing up? Stefan Shepherd: I remember being in the back seat of the car on weekend drives through northern California hillsides, listening to whatever easy listening station my parents could find. I still have a soft spot in my heart for Herb Alpert and ABBA... I remember my dad building an electronic organ with multiple keyboards and pedals, the works, when I was in elementary school, maybe first or second grade? I took lessons for maybe 8 or 9 years. I even took piano lessons for a year or two to strengthen my fingers for organ, that's how hardcore we were... We went through Babies R Us when my wife was pregnant with Miss Mary Mack. I was excited to look through their CD section. I recall it being pretty small. We found a CD -- I can't even remember the title and I doubt we have it anymore -- and I remember being very disappointed when I actually listened to the thing -- the nameless (literally, there were no credits on the thing) people responsible for the music couldn't have been bad musicians, but they produced something so schlocky that we had to find something else to listen to. **** IMG_6387.jpgLast week Jeff Bogle from the fine kids music website Out with the Kids participated in a "debate" with the music critic and musician Tom Moon. Heard on WHYY's Radio Times, the hour-long program featured a discussion of whether kids should listen to kids' music or adult music. You can probably guess which side Jeff took, and therefore can also deduce Mr. Moon's position on the question at hand. I say "debate" in quotation marks, because, as someone quipped on Facebook near the end of the hour, it was like hearing a fundamentalist debate a Unitarian Universalist. Jeff would cede some eminently reasonable point made by Tom ("You're not going to catch me arguing against the Beatles"), while Moon would entirely refuse to grant even a single point Mr. Bogle made worth considering. Let's put it this way -- it started out by Tom criticizing Lunch Money's gently amusing fable "It Only Takes One Night To Make a Balloon Your Friend" (listen here). As the 20- or 30-second excerpt ended, Moon railed against it as a song teaching kids to make friends with balloons (it's, um, not) and by the end of the show seemed to imply that Mozart would never have composed his many masterpieces had he listened to music like that. For someone so interested in musical discovery he wrote an entire book about it (1,000 Records To Hear Before You Die -- download the list here) to be so utterly dismissive of an entire subset of music (in response to hearing the Dan Zanes/Sharon Jones cover of "In the Basement," he said that it was nice, but he was pretty sure he'd enjoy anything on her records with the Dap-Kings than on that album -- sound unheard) was a little dispiriting. At first I chalked it up to the way that debates end up polarizing the argument so that people are more concerned with making points rather than finding some common understanding. But maybe I misunderstood Tom Moon -- maybe he completely believes that, that there is no point to kids' music. **** This past year I've thought some about how to spread the word about great kids' music to the world at large. So I presented at the EMP Pop Conference on adult artists creating second careers in kids music, for example. And I've tossed around some other ideas. But what if there are lots of people who ask: "So what? Who. Cares." It's not an unreasonable question. We in the kids music world spend so much time talking about what we think to be good kids' music -- mostly to others in the kids' music world -- that we don't take a step back and say why it's important in the first place. My goal here, then, is to lay out my theory of why kids' music is not only valid but important. I've borrowed a few pieces of information here and there (and I'll note those borrowings accordingly), but the theory (and its faults) are entirely my own.

54th GRAMMY Nominations: Best Children's Album

GrammyLogo.gifFirst, let's get the technical stuff out of the way -- here is the list of the nominees for Best Children's Album, with the winner to be announced Feb. 12: All About Bullies... Big And Small - Various Artists (James Cravero, Gloria Domina, Kevin Mackie, Steve Pullara & Patrick Robinson, producers) Are We There Yet? - The Papa Hugs Band Fitness Rock & Roll - Miss Amy GulfAlive - The Banana Plant I Love: Tom T. Hall's Songs of Fox Hollow - Various Artists (Eric Brace & Peter Cooper, producers) OK, now that I have that out of the way. WHAT???!? Now, let it first be said that I totally expected the GRAMMYs' decision to combine 2 children's categories into one to spell a death knell for independent artists. I was obviously completely wrong, seeing as all five nominees are independently produced. So make of that what you will regarding my understanding of the GRAMMY process.